CO129-060 - Public Offices - 1856 — Page 262

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

260

AGI

are &

requent that in laging

2.

the same before Rev. Secretary Schouchere, you will suggest to him the expediency of disallowing Ordinance in question.

I am,

the

"Your most obedient humble Servant,

Men Meemale

4 Nov 19

This

allend.

is an instance of the inconversmo

the most office practice of sending all paper which raise

any byd question at once

to the Law Advisen, without

any sifting

preparation. The

2. Mice Lan

how sent

Nem

a

Colonial adñame, without reflecting

Nel comil ordinance an dealt with

to our own wiles - now

here according to

or Law actually

it to happens the in

whened Mis

auxiting Meir ansan.

16 Nem 2

with regard to the particular portion clauses of which the Law Advisen disappion: they raise a question of

som little importune. INC. Anstey (a whrern framed the Hong Kong ordinance) was no doubt impushed with the hegunt failure of justice, in funcurtions for perjury, in consiguence of its est being mast out that the avermento perjuriously sworn to were "material." No don't he felt, tout the offence of perging was just The same whether the avements won" matenal"

He therefore compared what he

or no.

considered an imporment

imprarment on the law of England - But the Law Articu say, that colonial law, in criminal ratten, aught not to mosted the limits of the law of England. And unlch Bere are

spavil Coral reasons to the contrary,

Edit History

2026-05-18 07:56:40 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
260 AGI are & requent that in laging 2. the same before Rev. Secretary Schouchere, you will suggest to him the expediency of disallowing Ordinance in question. I am, the "Your most obedient humble Servant, Men Meemale 4 Nov 19 This allend. is an instance of the inconversmo the most office practice of sending all paper which raise any byd question at once to the Law Advisen, without any sifting preparation. The 2. Mice Lan how sent Nem a Colonial adñame, without reflecting Nel comil ordinance an dealt with to our own wiles - now here according to or Law actually it to happens the in whened Mis auxiting Meir ansan. 16 Nem 2 with regard to the particular portion clauses of which the Law Advisen disappion: they raise a question of som little importune. INC. Anstey (a whrern framed the Hong Kong ordinance) was no doubt impushed with the hegunt failure of justice, in funcurtions for perjury, in consiguence of its est being mast out that the avermento perjuriously sworn to were "material." No don't he felt, tout the offence of perging was just The same whether the avements won" matenal" He therefore compared what he or no. considered an imporment imprarment on the law of England - But the Law Articu say, that colonial law, in criminal ratten, aught not to mosted the limits of the law of England. And unlch Bere are spavil Coral reasons to the contrary,
Baseline (Original)
260 AGI are & requent that in laging 2. the same before Rev. Lecretary Schouchere, you will suggest to him the expediency of disallowing Ordinance in question. I am. the "Jour most obedient humble Lervant. Men Meemale 4 Nom 19 This allend. is an instance of the inconversmo the mort ffice practice of sending all paper which saise эні any byd question at once to the Law Advisen, without any sifting preparation. The 2. Mice Lan how sent Nem a ר Colomid adñame, without reflecting Nel comil ordinance an dealt with to our own wiles - now here according to or Lave actually it to happens the in whened Mis ты погали auxiting Meir ansan. 16 Nem 2 with regard to the Larticular Soortion clauses of which the Law Advisen. disappion : they raise a question f som little importume. INC. Anstey (a whrern framed the Hong Kong erdinance) was no doubt impushed with the hegunt failure of justice, in funcurtions for perjury, in consiguence of its est being mast out that the avermento perjuriously sworn to were " material." No don't he felt, tout the offence of perging was just The same whether the avements won" matenal" He therefore compared what he or no. considered an imporment imprarment on the lawof England - But the Law Articu say, that colonial law, in criminal ratten, aught not to mosted the limits of the law of England. And unlch Bere are I spavil Coral reasons to the contrary, | !
2026-05-18 07:56:40 · Baseline
View content

260

AGI

are &

requent that in laging

2.

the same before Rev. Lecretary Schouchere, you will suggest to him the expediency of disallowing Ordinance in question.

I am.

the

"Jour most obedient humble Lervant.

Men Meemale

4 Nom 19

This

allend.

is an instance of the inconversmo

the mort ffice practice of sending all paper which saise эні

any byd question at once

to the Law Advisen, without

any sifting

preparation. The

2. Mice Lan

how sent

Nem

a

ר

Colomid adñame, without reflecting

Nel comil ordinance an dealt with

to our own wiles - now

here according to

or Lave actually

it to happens the in

whened Mis

ты

погали

auxiting Meir ansan.

16 Nem 2

with regard to the Larticular Soortion clauses of which the Law Advisen. disappion : they raise a question f

som little importume. INC. Anstey (a whrern framed the Hong Kong erdinance) was no doubt impushed with the hegunt failure of justice, in funcurtions for perjury, in consiguence of its est being mast out that the avermento perjuriously sworn to were " material." No don't he felt, tout the offence of perging was just The same whether the avements won" matenal"

He therefore compared what he

or no.

considered an imporment

imprarment on the lawof England - But the Law Articu say, that colonial law, in criminal ratten, aught not to mosted the limits of the law of England. And unlch Bere are I

spavil Coral reasons to the contrary,

|

!

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.